Question:
30's 40's boxing?
2008-05-15 00:20:15 UTC
Alot of people say like Muhammad ali would beat Marciano and joe Louis or goerge foreman would beat them but have you ever thought that maybe foreman and ali could have never won them in that era. Because in rocky's and joes era there was no standing up count and the gloves were lighter then the gloves used in alis era.
Five answers:
2008-05-15 04:23:14 UTC
The old guys would kill these young turks. Those guys were so much tougher- they fought all the time and stayed in shape. They don't call them 'The Greatest Generation' for nothing.
2008-05-15 12:27:49 UTC
Whether it 1920 or 1940 or 1960 or whatever, whether it's a bare fist or a gloved fist, Ali was still super fast and hard to hit. That doesn't change no matter what the circumstance is. What people don't understand is that the lighter gloves will help Ali's punches the most, turning his relatively weaker, slashing punches into a more decisive blow. Smaller gloves would help the fighters who punch in volume with average shots.
2008-05-15 07:31:13 UTC
Foreman Would Have Killed Somebody And Ali Might Have Knocked More Out. No Big Deal In Differences. No Matter
Ron B
2008-05-15 08:18:18 UTC
Ali would have beat that era, but I think Foreman's straight forward style would be just what the 30's-40's era guys like. So it's a toss up who would win if Foreman would face those guys.
Wolverine
2008-05-15 08:00:18 UTC
Nah! A good fighter is still a good fighter no matter what period they are from.


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...